Thursday, January 19, 2012

Blog M William Tuleu


Blog M William Tuleu

I am interested in studying Mark 16: 9-20 because of both its illogical following from Mark 16: 8 as well as its “reputedly Pauline flavor”.[1]  Indeed, there is debate whether or not Mark himself wrote this verse or if it were originally Paul’s work.  Through a textual criticism lens, I aim to study the true authorship of these verses.

Bruns, J. Edgar. “A Note on Mark 16: 9-20”. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 9:3. 1947: 358-359


[1] J. E. Bruns, “A Note on Mark 16: 9-20” CBQ 9:3 (1947), 358

No comments:

Post a Comment