In the formation of an early Christian orthodoxy, church fathers
try to move past the idea of having accepted yet non-canonical sources for supplementary
materials in the moral and spiritual lives of the Christian community. The goal in this endeavor centers on the
early church’s need for a unified coalition of leaders able to stand under one
banner. Yet while not espousing the
continued circulation of non-canonical texts Christianity’s sister religions,
Judaism and Islam, do keep the idea of accepted non-canonical works integrated
within their traditions.
One can find Jews living during the Babylonian exile
striving to keep their oral traditions alive in a very real sense with the
Talmudic elaborations on the Genesis stories.
Out of that tradition we derive the fall from grace story of Lucifer
which doesn’t get touched on until Toledo some two thousand years later or
accepted as part of Christian tradition until Milton publishes Paradise Lost. The idea with this is those stories keep
growing like a movie franchise as Divine Inspiration strikes the reader. This actually keeps with the idea of
apostolic tradition where the Holy Spirit strikes an individual empowering them
to carry out divine acts which the book of Acts centers around. [1]
Voices in the church loved this idea finding it a valid argument for the making
a work part of the accepted orthodox cannon.
Even the Qur’an has their non-canonical portions kept in
Islamic traditions where the Sunnah or a Hadith can be sited for legal precedence
or moral guidance. The Ottoman Turks
were famous for their collections of Hadiths attributed to any of the major
characters found in the Qur’an, even the angels, written centuries after
death. The reasoning behind this we
attribute to the want of authors to view those people as dramatis personae from
whom they draw authority as well as to make larger than life. We see this with Paul’s letters. While the Qur’an might not cover oral
hygiene, one of the most valid Hadiths does citing Mohammed having a habit of chewing
on roots that were used as a precursor to the modern day toothbrush or plaque
pick.
Bibliography
Thomas R. Correlation of Revelatory Spiritual Gifts and NT
Canonicity. Master's Seminary Journal [serial online]. March 1,
1997;8(1):5-28. Available from: ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, Ipswich,
MA. Accessed January 26, 2012.
[1] Thomas,
R. L. (1997). Correlation of Revelatory Spiritual Gifts and NT Canonicity. Master's
Seminary Journal, 8(1), 5-28.
No comments:
Post a Comment